Patch proposal: handling multiple Set-Cookie headers from backend

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <4A029B1A60B8E340A50D654D2F130DAA2FCEA3AA1B at EXCV001.encara.local.ads
>, "MAGNIEN, Thierry" writes:

>OK, thanks for your response. However, does this mean my patch would be OK =
>for a version 2.1.5 if trunk is not "production-stable" enough ?

I do not want that change committed, if that's what you're asking, it
would cost serious workspace eatage for some sites.

But for your own private use it should be fine.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.