Varnish code coverage results online

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

--------
In message <CABoVN9Ad=R+qyAGz1+_XYXbzOvr6krHUYVoBi44PyEGUeNm7ig at mail.gmail.com>, Dridi Boukelmoune 
writes:

>I thought gcov'ed binaries could run concurrently if the underlying
>file-system allowed it. I never had any issue with gcov and parallel
>builds and regardless, if varnishtest spawns a varnishd, won't they
>compete on coverage collection for libvarnish for instance?

Last I tried it, I got totally screwed up numbers.

(And no, because varnishtest waits for varnishd to exit before it
exits.)

>I don't know about simplest, running nightly builds from a script that
>runs pseudo-continuously doesn't sound straightforward.

if `date +%Y%m%d` changed do gcov ?


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.