Support Cache-Control no-cache/private as per RFC2616 ?

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

"BUSTARRET, Jean-francois" <jfbustarret at wat.tv> writes:
> IMHO, this is mainly a documentation problem. Why not :
> - remove the term "reverse proxy" from the FAQ and replace it by "HTTP Accelerator",
> - describe exactly what/when varnish caches by default,
> - describe how to build a RFC2616 reverse proxy, and bundle a sample vcl with varnish.
>
> As Poul-Henning told, someone should contribute/sponsor this. Having
> more time than money (and feeling not 100% welcome here), I can
> write some documentation if you agree.

Documentation is always welcome.  The wiki needs a lot of work, and
both Poul-Henning and I have far too much to do (both with Varnish and
other projects) to be able to spend much time on it.

BTW, could I suggest that you subscribe to varnish-misc or varnish-dev
(or both) so I don't have to manually approve everything you send to
the list?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Senior Software Developer
Linpro AS - www.linpro.no