Varnish 1.1.2, still core dumps

[Anders Nordby]

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Anders Nordby wrote:
> This is ticket #142 biting me again, now with Varnish 1.1.2:
> 
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x0000000000408a90 in vbe_sock_conn (ai=0x0) at cache_backend.c:162
> #1  0x0000000000408b98 in vbe_conn_try (bp=0xaf1b80, pai=0x7ffffd1e7838)
>     at cache_backend.c:190
> #2  0x0000000000408d14 in vbe_connect (sp=0xc15008, bp=0xaf1b80)
>     at cache_backend.c:228
> #3  0x000000000040912e in vbe_nextfd (sp=0xc15008) at
> cache_backend.c:299
> #4  0x0000000000409372 in VBE_GetFd (sp=0xc15008) at cache_backend.c:336
> #5  0x000000000040cafa in Fetch (sp=0xc15008) at cache_fetch.c:278
> #6  0x000000000040a124 in cnt_fetch (sp=0xc15008) at cache_center.c:300
> #7  0x000000000040b18d in CNT_Session (sp=0xc15008) at steps.h:40
> #8  0x0000000000412cf8 in wrk_do_one (w=0x7ffffd1e7ad0) at
> cache_pool.c:194
> #9  0x00000000004131f3 in wrk_thread (priv=0x8562e0) at cache_pool.c:248
> #10 0x000000080098755b in pthread_create () from /usr/lib/libthr.so.2
> #11 0x00007ffffcfea000 in ?? ()
> Cannot access memory at address 0x7ffffd1ea000

Discussing this with Daniel on the IRC channel, I wonder why commits
like changeset 1892 and 1965 etc. in cache_backend.c have been merged to
the 1.2 branch, but not to 1.1 and the 1.1.2 release? Are there other
merges that should have been done but were forgotten?

DES?

Bye,

-- 
Anders.