Poor #requests/second performance

[Andreas Jung]

Sorry for the noise. The customer was running a transparent proxy within
the network
without telling me. Now I reach a performance of roughly 3000
requests/seconds which
is fast enough however still slower than Squid.

Andreas

On 01.06.09 19:47, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Running Varnish 2.0.4 on a Debian installation (dual-core, 2.8 GHz).
>
> Apache-Bench gives me a performance of 500-600 requests/second against
> a cached HTML page - even with an almost empty VCL configuration file.
>
> Squid gives me about 4000 requests/second on the same cached page.
>
> What is the best approach for narrowing down the bottleneck?
>
> Andreas
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>   


-- 
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: info at zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535
Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lists.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20090602/c6647ae3/attachment-0003.vcf>