varnish storage tuning
Mike Perham
mperham at onespot.com
Fri Jun 12 00:40:02 CEST 2009
Darryl, that sounds right. Yes, this is in our vcl_recv handler. I was
watching varnish in top today and the memory just crept up by 1-2k every few
seconds, monotonically increasing. This seems like a major issue - I'm
surprised that purge_url doesn't just do that under the covers.
I'll see if I can't adjust our VCL logic as you suggest. Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Darryl Dixon - Winterhouse Consulting <
darryl.dixon at winterhouseconsulting.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Quite possibly the purge_url usage is causing you a problem. I assume this
> is something that is being invoked from your VCL, rather than telnet-ing
> to the administrative interface or by varnishadm?
>
> My testing showed that with purge_url in the VCL, a 'purge record' was
> created every time the rule was struck, and that record never seemed to be
> removed, which meant that memory grew without bound nearly continuously
> (new memory allocated for each new purge record). See the thread I started
> here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no/msg02520.html
>
> Instead, in vcl_hit, if the object should be purged, set obj.ttl to 0 and
> then restart the request. This solved the problem for me.
>
> regards,
> Darryl Dixon
> Winterhouse Consulting Ltd
> http://www.winterhouseconsulting.com
>
>
>
>
> > We're using Varnish and finding that Linux runs the OOM killer on the
> > large
> > varnish child process every few days. I'm not sure what's causing the
> > memory to grow but now I want to tune it so that I know configuration is
> > not
> > an issue.
> > The default config we were using was 10MB. We're using a small 32-bit
> EC2
> > instance (Linux 2.6.21.7-2.fc8xen) with 1.75G of RAM and 10GB of disk so
> I
> > changed the storage specification to
> > "file,/var/lib/varnish/varnish_storage.bin,1500M". I'd like to be able
> > give
> > varnish 8GB of disk but it complains about sizes larger than 2GB. 32-bit
> > limitation?
> >
> > Side note: I couldn't find any good doc on the various command line
> > parameters for varnishd. The 2.0.4 src only contains a man page for vcl.
> > It would be nice to see a man page for varnishd and its options.
> >
> > We are using purge_url heavily as we update documents - this shouldn't
> > cause
> > unchecked grow though, right? We aren't using regexps to purge.
> >
> >
> >
> > Attached is the /var/log/messages output from the oom-killer and here's a
> > few lines for the lazy. I can't grok the output.
> >
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: varnishd invoked oom-killer:
> > gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0, oomkilladj=0
> > [...snip...]
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: Mem-info:
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: DMA per-cpu:
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: CPU 0: Hot: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd:
> 94
> > Cold: hi: 62, btch: 15 usd: 60
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: HighMem per-cpu:
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: CPU 0: Hot: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd:
> 26
> > Cold: hi: 62, btch: 15 usd: 14
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: Active:213349 inactive:210447 dirty:0
> > writeback:0 unstable:0
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: free:1957 slab:1078 mapped:23
> > pagetables:1493 bounce:13
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: DMA free:7324kB min:3440kB low:4300kB
> > high:5160kB active:355572kB inactive:346580kB present:739644kB
> > pages_scanned:1108980 all_unreclaimable? yes
> >
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 972
> >
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: HighMem free:504kB min:512kB low:1668kB
> > high:2824kB active:497824kB inactive:495208kB present:995688kB
> > pages_scanned:1537436 all_unreclaimable? yes
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
> >
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: DMA: 11*4kB 10*8kB 42*16kB 12*32kB 2*64kB
> > 23*128kB 2*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 7324kB
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: HighMem: 1*4kB 6*8kB 4*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB
> > 1*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 500kB
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: Swap cache: add 1563900, delete 1563890,
> > find
> > 572160/581746, race 3+9
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: Free swap = 0kB
> >
> > Jun 11 15:35:02 (none) kernel: Total swap = 917496kB
> > _______________________________________________
> > varnish-misc mailing list
> > varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
> > http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20090611/13d38021/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list