varnish bottleneck?

[ll]

sorry, I meant  the  problem  is  not  leaded  by  the different 
between  pipe  and  pass .

but ,now , I  think  it's  my  fault .  I  still  not  understand  the  
different  between  pipe and  pass  very  well
now ,i think the  pipe  lead  this  problems .

? 2009-11-27 17:21, Lars Jørgensen ??:
> Den 27/11/2009 kl. 02.12 skrev ll:
>   
>> there are some problem .many of url's record can't be find in the
>> varnishlog .and there are no marked by the varnish eg "X-Cache: MISS" in
>> the Response Headers .
>> I had post this problem in this maillist .it's nothing about pipe or
>> pass about no marked.
>>     
>
> Well, if you have decided it has nothing to do with pipe, then we can't really help you, can we?
>
>
> --
> Lars
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at projects.linpro.no
> http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20091130/22659f9f/attachment-0002.html>