varnish with ssl
Michael Fischer
michael at dynamine.net
Thu Apr 8 19:39:48 CEST 2010
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Ken Brownfield <kb+varnish at slide.com> wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Michael Fischer wrote:
>>> The single-process model as regards scalability is a red herring.
>>
>> It matters a lot with SSL. The handshaking process is very
>> CPU-intensive. You really want something that's SMP-scalable.
>
> Run one single-process model process for each core in your machine. You also get the rather academic bonus of less context-switching and less cache thrash (assuming a decent scheduler and affinity). This is also how you would leverage multiple machines.
I don't disagree with you. But stunnel doesn't do that.
--Michael
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list