Varnish 2.1.4 rpm's - bad key error when installing on Centos 5.5 x86
Bob Camp
lists at rtty.us
Fri Nov 5 01:17:42 CET 2010
Hi
If you have both of the files present you can do a rpm --nosignature -Uvh varnish*
That will get rid of the failed dependency issue.
Bob
On Nov 4, 2010, at 7:21 PM, Glen Kelly wrote:
> Hi Ruslan
>
> That sort of worked, I had to use the –nosignature flag instead. Also because of dependencies it would not let me upgrade, I had to uninstall and reinstall.
>
> But big negative is that it breaks the rpm -q option. Until these rpm’s are fixed I cannot use them in production. I assume the developers read this mailing list but in case they don’t how do I go about raising a bug report?
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm --nosignature -Uvh varnish-libs-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> varnish-libs = 2.1.3-1.el5 is needed by (installed) varnish-2.1.3-1.el5.x86_64
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm --nosignature -Uvh varnish-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> varnish-libs = 2.1.4-1.el5 is needed by varnish-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm -qa | grep varn
> varnish-libs-2.1.3-1.el5
> varnish-2.1.3-1.el5
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm -e varnish-2.1.3-1.el5
> warning: /etc/varnish/default.vcl saved as /etc/varnish/default.vcl.rpmsave
> warning: /etc/sysconfig/varnish saved as /etc/sysconfig/varnish.rpmsave
> warning: /etc/logrotate.d/varnish saved as /etc/logrotate.d/varnish.rpmsave
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm -e varnish-libs-2.1.3-1.el5
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm --nosignature -i varnish-libs-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm --nosignature -i varnish-2.1.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# rpm -qa | grep varn
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 395 Header V4 RSA/SHA256 signature: BAD, key ID c4deffeb
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 394 Header V4 RSA/SHA256 signature: BAD, key ID c4deffeb
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# service varnish start
> Starting varnish HTTP accelerator: [ OK ]
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# service varnishlog start
> Starting varnish logging daemon: [ OK ]
>
> (root at bolrpdev1:/tmp)# varnishd -V
> varnishd (varnish-2.1.4 SVN 5447M)
> Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Linpro AS / Verdens Gang AS
>
> Regards Glen
>
> <tasfire_wakeup_small4cad.jpg>
> P Do you need to print this? Consider the environment, prevent paper waste.
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
> The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.
>
> From: Ruslan Sivak [mailto:russ at vshift.com]
> Sent: Friday, 5 November 2010 12:47 AM
> To: Glen Kelly
> Subject: Re: Varnish 2.1.4 rpm's - bad key error when installing on Centos 5.5 x86
>
> The workaround is to download the 2 rpms manually and run
>
> rpm --signature -Uvh varnish*
>
> I hope whoever is generating the rpms fixes this soon as well as generates some x32 rpms.
>
> Is this possibly the wrong list to ask for this? Should it be on the dev list, or should I file an issue in the bug tracker?
>
> Russ
>
> On Nov 4, 2010 1:42 AM, "Glen Kelly" <Glen.Kelly at fire.tas.gov.au> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am receiving the same errors as described here when installing on Centos 5.5 x86.
> >
> > error: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 signature: BAD, key ID c4deffeb
> >
> > Is there a known solution?
> >
> > Also will the 2.1.4 rpm's be eventually available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/varnish/files/?
> >
> > Regards Glen
> >
> <tasfire_wakeup_small4cad.jpg>_______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> http://lists.varnish-cache.org/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.varnish-cache.org/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20101104/01cb4732/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list