Is LCI on the radar?
Lukas Kahwe Smith
mls at pooteeweet.org
Fri Sep 2 09:52:06 CEST 2011
On Jun 28, 2011, at 10:49 , Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> On 28.06.2011, at 10:42, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <4B5D88B4-F620-43C0-AB8A-DE19565B22DF at pooteeweet.org>, Lukas Kahwe S
>> mith writes:
>>
>>>> I assume some of you have stumbled over LCI by now:
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-linked-cache-inv-00.txt
>>
>> It's not a proposal I particular is happy about because it is very
>> expensive to implement one way or the other.
>>
>> But I made a quick attempt and you can implement this using VCL and bans
>> in Varnish already, so I don't expect to do more about it.
>
>
> I would appreciate it a lot if your tests and Laurence's solution [1] could somehow we documented on the wiki. We will happily beta test it :)
>
> regards,
> Lukas Kahwe Smith
> mls at pooteeweet.org
>
> [1] http://dev.plone.org/collective/browser/experimental.depends/trunk/varnish.vcl
ok .. it looks like there is a good chance we will work on something based on the above for a large news site which is drives multiple separate frontends (each with their own caching) from a single backend. here is my game plan:
http://pooteeweet.org/blog/1979
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
mls at pooteeweet.org
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list