No-cache but still a HIT

[Aanchal Gera]

Before trying no-cache header, I used s-maxage=0. Even then, I had a HIT at
times :(

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Omega BK <omegabk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Varnish takes care of the s-maxage, you have to send it on your header to
> specify the duration of the TTL
>
> Best.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 8 oct. 2012, at 10:45, Aanchal Gera <aanchal.gera at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ohh, Is it!!!
>
> So, what would be the best way to tell Varnish that I don't want to cache
> an ESI fragment?
>
> Regards,
> Aanchal
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen <apj at mutt.dk>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:03:55PM +0530, Aanchal Gera wrote:
>> >
>> > I have set the Cache-Control directives as "no-cache" for an ESI
>> fragment.
>> > Even then, I receive a HIT from Varnish. How is this possible?
>>
>> You'll have to implement no-cache in VCL yourself, it's not honored by
>> default.
>>
>> --
>> Andreas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> varnish-misc mailing list
>> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-misc mailing list
> varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20121008/dabbd7da/attachment.html>