Threads in 4.0

[Andreas Plesner Jacobsen]

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:09:58AM +0200, Per Buer wrote:
> > >
> > > Just downgraded to 3.0 and everything's working again. Persistent
> > > storage is a nice-to-have to avoid cold caches after restarts/crashes,
> > > but 4.0 clearly needs some work before it goes anywhere near production.
> >
> > It sounds like you've upgraded to get persistent? Persistent is still
> > experimental, just as it was in 3.0.
> >
> 
> Experimental is misleading, it makes it sound like the code has a future. I
> think the persistence code is still there because nobody has bothered
> disabling it yet.
> 
> There is no work being done on the persistent. I doubt someone will pick it
> up.

True. My point was mostly that I would expect persistent to act just as bad in
3.0 as in 4.0, so it should never be the reason for upgrading.

-- 
Andreas