304 resource moved showing in varnish logs
Tim Dunphy
bluethundr at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 23:20:11 CET 2015
>
> Don't worry about it. The client did a conditional request and Varnish
> just confirmed that the content they have is valid. Hence no need to
> retransmit the content (note the zero length body).
Thanks for that feedback, Per! Makes perfect sense.
Best regards,
Tim
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Per Buer <perbu at varnish-software.com>
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Tim Dunphy <bluethundr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey varnish folks,
>>
>>
>> It's been brought to my attention at the company that I work for that
>> entries with '304' status in them keep turning up in the varnish log
>> (/var/log/varnish.log).
>>
>> Such as what you see here: (..)
>>
>
> Don't worry about it. The client did a conditional request and Varnish
> just confirmed that the content they have is valid. Hence no need to
> retransmit the content (note the zero length body).
>
> Per.
>
> --
> *Per Buer*
> CTO | Varnish Software AS
> Cell: +47 95839117
> We Make Websites Fly!
> www.varnish-software.com
> [image: Register now]
> <http://info.varnish-software.com/varnish-summits-autumn-2014-registration>
>
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20150219/d542ea95/attachment.html>
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list