Hit for Pass after "return(pass)" in vcl_recv

[Nigel Peck]

Thanks for this. I did some testing and can confirm it won't enter the 
cache at all as you say.

Nigel

On 11/05/2017 20:40, Guillaume Quintard wrote:
> IIRC, no it won't because it's a pass, so the new object won't enter the 
> cache at all.
> 
> -- 
> Guillaume Quintard
> 
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Nigel Peck <np.lists at sharphosting.uk 
> <mailto:np.lists at sharphosting.uk>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     I'm wondering what happens with requests that were marked
>     return(pass) by vcl_recv, when they get to vcl_backend_response. If
>     I do the following:
> 
>     set beresp.http.Cache-Control = "private, max-age=0, no-cache,
>     no-store";
>     set beresp.http.Expires = "Mon, 01 Jan 2001 00:00:00 GMT";
>     set beresp.ttl = 120s;
>     set beresp.uncacheable = true;
>     return (deliver);
> 
>     Is that going to mark them hit-for-pass? Or can they not be cached
>     in any way now? (even hit for pass) Is the "uncacheable" redundant
>     because they were already marked for pass?
> 
>     I would appreciate any further info on this.
> 
>     Thanks
>     Nigel
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     varnish-misc mailing list
>     varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org <mailto:varnish-misc at varnish-cache.org>
>     https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
>     <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc>
> 
>