reg: not getting ReqAcct tag in varnishlog

[Hardik]

Hi Dridi,

Can you give me a list of log records you need to collect?

SLT_Timestamp :
SLT_ReqStart :
SLT_ReqMethod :
SLT_ReqURL:
SLT_ReqProtocol :
SLT_RespStatus :
SLT_ReqHeader :
SLT_RespHeader :
SLT_ReqAcct :
SLT_BereqAcct :
SLT_VCL_Log :

And
possibly how you are trying to group them if they come from different
transactions?
*I am reading based xid ( by FD ). Means reading full records per fd.*

Please let me know if any other information I can provide..


If this is not related to my problem still I am curious to know how
grouping is happening. You can point out some code or links with some
details, I will go through.

Thank you
Hardik

On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 00:43, Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi at varni.sh> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:53 PM Hardik <hetardik.p at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dridi,
> >
> > I am reading few tags for Billing purpose. I have added VMOD for this.In
> vmod currently I was passing "-g session" option to varnish callback
> function. But I found out that not getting ReqAcct tag. Also I am missing
> lots of logs itself.
> >
> > After with discussion with you guys it seems problem is due to "-g
> session" option. So I removed that and tested again and looks better then
> before. Reduced frequency of missing ReqAcct and Log loss decreased a lot.
> >
> > Now, my doubt, Is it better not to use any option and keep default
> setting, or to use -c option ? So I can minimize log loss as many as I can.
> >
> > Here is small from vmod which is reading shared memory (it was lot
> easier in varnish 3 because I was able to call dispatch function directly),
> > vut =  VUT_Init(argv[0], 1, argv, &s);
> > vut->dispatch_f = VarnishLog::handler;
> > vut->dispatch_priv = this;
> > vut->g_arg = 3;  <----  I commented out this now ( -g session )
> > vut->sighup = 1;
> > vut->sighup_f = VarnishLog::sighup;
> > VUT_Setup(vut);
> > VUT_Main(vut);
> > VUT_Fini(&vut);
>
> So you wrote your own log utility in C++? Wow!
>
> > I can not change above whole setup but can modify few things in that.
> >
> > Now, If you can answer previous questions will be really helpful.
> Particularly how -g session option creating problem ?
>
> Sorry but this is not what I was looking for. [1]
>
> Can you give me a list of log records you need to collect? And
> possibly how you are trying to group them if they come from different
> transactions? There's a lot we can do without building a new utility.
>
> Dridi
>
> [1] http://xyproblem.info/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20190319/ad94d9d8/attachment-0001.html>