Header names case sensitivity
Jérémy Lecour
jeremy.lecour at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 10:03:23 UTC 2022
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:56 AM Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:
> not everybody reads RFCs recreationally...
What ?? I'm shocked ! :D
I spent 2 hours last night reading parts of the RFC9110 about HTTP and I've
learnt a lot about HTTP headers.
For example, the "X-" prefix for non-standard headers has been deprecated
since 2012.
It was a good idea in theory but proven to be counter productive, based on
the long running experimentation in email and SIP (and HTTP).
For Varnish I guess we're stuck with the X- prefix since it became a
de-facto standard.
--
Jérémy Lecour :
https://jeremy.lecour.fr - http://twitter.com/jlecour
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-misc/attachments/20221214/ca1afae6/attachment.html>
More information about the varnish-misc
mailing list