[Varnish] #906: Varnish 2.1.x packages for el5 are not signed
Max Parmer
maxp at pdx.edu
Wed Apr 27 22:52:15 CEST 2011
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 07:40 +0000, Varnish wrote:
> #906: Varnish 2.1.x packages for el5 are not signed
> ------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
> Reporter: maxp | Type: defect
> Status: new | Priority: high
> Milestone: | Component: build
> Version: trunk | Severity: major
> Keywords: gpg rpm security |
> ------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
>
> Comment(by tfheen):
>
> The reason for the RPMs being unsigned is signing them breaks RPM and
> corrupts the RPM database. Now, this is of course a bug in, but rather
> than breaking machines we distribute unsigned packages.
>
> I'm unlikely to change this, but will leave the bug open for now.
>
Could you tell me more about how it breaks? I am willing to help fix
this issue.
--
Max Parmer
CIS UNIX
503.725.9157
More information about the varnish-bugs
mailing list