[Varnish] #940: ETag for gzip'd variant identical to ETag of ungzipped variant.

[Varnish]

#940: ETag for gzip'd variant identical to ETag of ungzipped variant.
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  david  |        Type:  defect  
   Status:  new    |    Priority:  high    
Milestone:         |   Component:  build   
  Version:  3.0.0  |    Severity:  critical
 Keywords:         |  
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------

Comment(by david):

 oh! I didn't even think about changing it back in vcl_recv. I'll try that.

 You used the word inverse, and I read it as reverse, and thought "huh,
 that's an interesting idea, reverse the same etag for gzip variant" - then
 I realized that's not what you were saying. Maybe it is an idea you can
 think about, to tag a gzip-vs-unzip variant. Just reverse the etag for one
 of them. :)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/ticket/940#comment:4>
Varnish <http://varnish-cache.org/>
The Varnish HTTP Accelerator