[master] 8c2ed01 Propagate the VCL syntax to VRT_CTX.

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

--------
In message <CABoVN9CWEPhPGHbbzj5ygsZ7D6g+fgVBORUzpmEhUPj_PJH7MA at mail.gmail.com>
, Dridi Boukelmoune writes:
>On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at freebsd.org> wrote:

><snip>
>> -varnish v1 -errvcl {VCL sub's named 'vcl*' are reserved names.} {
>> +varnish v1 -errvcl {The names 'vcl*' are reserved for methods.} {
><snip>
>
>Hi,
>
>Can we avoid vocabulary overloading here? I know that on the C side we
>refer to subs as methods (and maybe we should change that) but in the
>documentation we call them subroutines.
>
>We already have other user-facing meanings for methods (VCL's
>(be)?req.method and VCC's $Method).

By all means just fix stuff like that (but remember the VTCs)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.