[master] 5e2b0d8 If gzip support is off, we still need to esi process

Nils Goroll nils.goroll at uplex.de
Thu Mar 15 19:08:22 UTC 2018

On 15/03/18 18:13, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Do we really want to neuter do_g[un]zip set _manually_ in VCL when
> _automatic_ gzip support is disabled?

Not sure, I think this is how it was before, but we might want to change our mind.

More interesting question: Does esi really work with these changes, even if the
backend responds with CE: gzip? Or do we maybe want to disable gzip if esi and
! cache_param->http_gzip_support?

Need to invest more time. This regression is much more severe than I thought,
apologies again.



** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung

Scheffelstraße 32
22301 Hamburg

tel +49 40 28805731
mob +49 170 2723133
fax +49 40 42949753



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-commit/attachments/20180315/3119393b/attachment.bin>

More information about the varnish-commit mailing list