[master] d0a2ec9 Only handle signals if we still have a VUT

Dridi Boukelmoune dridi at varni.sh
Wed May 2 09:55:48 UTC 2018

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Federico Schwindt <fgsch at lodoss.net> wrote:
> Why not return earlier in VUT_Signaled if vut is NULL rather than checking
> in every handler?

Because VUT_Signaled is part of a public API. All our utilities are of
the single-VUT-single-thread persuasion, that may not be the case
out of tree.

I don't think we should relax assertions.


More information about the varnish-commit mailing list