[master] c72674662 fix between bytes timeout vs total timeout
Nils Goroll
nils.goroll at uplex.de
Thu Feb 21 17:34:30 UTC 2019
On 21/02/2019 18:13, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Does this mean the client side total timeout applies to bgfetch too?
No, that's the NAN argument here:
diff --git a/bin/varnishd/http1/cache_http1_fetch.c
b/bin/varnishd/http1/cache_http1_fetch.c
index fa456a408..f4ee4ebf0 100644
--- a/bin/varnishd/http1/cache_http1_fetch.c
+++ b/bin/varnishd/http1/cache_http1_fetch.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ V1F_FetchRespHdr(struct busyobj *bo)
t = VTIM_real() + htc->first_byte_timeout;
hs = HTC_RxStuff(htc, HTTP1_Complete, NULL, NULL,
- t, t + htc->between_bytes_timeout, cache_param->http_resp_size);
+ t, NAN, htc->between_bytes_timeout, cache_param->http_resp_size);
if (hs != HTC_S_COMPLETE) {
bo->acct.beresp_hdrbytes +=
htc->rxbuf_e - htc->rxbuf_b;
--
** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung
Scheffelstraße 32
22301 Hamburg
tel +49 40 28805731
mob +49 170 2723133
fax +49 40 42949753
xmpp://slink@jabber.int.uplex.de/
http://uplex.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-commit/attachments/20190221/0199b0aa/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the varnish-commit
mailing list