[master] 03a11d4e7 spelling: collapse

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

commit 03a11d4e711aee7e86907799830f6d1ae9c52e4a
Author: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref at users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 7 08:30:54 2024 -0400

    spelling: collapse
    
    Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref at users.noreply.github.com>

diff --git a/bin/varnishd/storage/storage_malloc.c b/bin/varnishd/storage/storage_malloc.c
index 2c3ce5b5b..7e7a7b8ac 100644
--- a/bin/varnishd/storage/storage_malloc.c
+++ b/bin/varnishd/storage/storage_malloc.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ sma_alloc(const struct stevedore *st, size_t size)
 		return (NULL);
 
 	/*
-	 * Do not collaps the sma allocation with sma->s.ptr: it is not
+	 * Do not collapse the sma allocation with sma->s.ptr: it is not
 	 * a good idea.  Not only would it make ->trim impossible,
 	 * performance-wise it would be a catastropy with chunksized
 	 * allocations growing another full page, just to accommodate the sma.
diff --git a/bin/varnishd/storage/storage_umem.c b/bin/varnishd/storage/storage_umem.c
index 770efb7d7..6d3402246 100644
--- a/bin/varnishd/storage/storage_umem.c
+++ b/bin/varnishd/storage/storage_umem.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ smu_alloc(const struct stevedore *st, size_t size)
 		return (NULL);
 
 	/*
-	 * Do not collaps the smu allocation with smu->s.ptr: it is not
+	 * Do not collapse the smu allocation with smu->s.ptr: it is not
 	 * a good idea.  Not only would it make ->trim impossible,
 	 * performance-wise it would be a catastropy with chunksized
 	 * allocations growing another full page, just to accommodate the smu.