Dridi the spellcheck checker

[Dridi Boukelmoune]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 2:14 PM Nils Goroll <nils.goroll at uplex.de> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Dridi, for once again being pedantic in a good way :)
>
> FTR, when the spell check commits happened I should have looked closer, but
> yeah, the whole thing somehow went a bit too fast...

Regardless of how a change was committed, having this mailing list is
very valuable to get a chance to review after the facts!

> I will consolidate two replies into one email:
>
> >> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ keep a place ready for it in the overall architecture.
> >>
> >>   Now a credible use-case finally appeared, and we have implemented
> >>   "Varnish Extensions" (VTLA: "VEXT"), which can both be used to load
> >> -ambient VMODs and to implement entirely new functionaly, for instance
> >> +ambient VMODs and to implement entirely new functionally, for instance
> >
> > Isn't the correct word functionality here?
>
> Yes.
>
> On 10.09.24 16:23, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
>  >>          For more than one invocation of ``VRT_call()``, VMODs*must*
>  >> -       check if ``VRT_handled()`` returns non-zero inbetween calls:
>  >> +       check if ``VRT_handled()`` returns non-zero in between calls:
>  > Isn't the correct spelling in-between in this context?
>
> I would think so, too.

I already fixed both and then more ;)

Dridi