andersb at vgnett.no
Fri Jul 21 11:01:55 CEST 2006
> "Anders Berg" <andersb at vgnett.no> writes:
>> Some FUD developed today when our frontpage editors sensed that their
>> Purge tool did not function correctly :) Sorry about that, and the
>> following phonecalls.
> Is this solely a Varnish issue? I did som checking when Stein Ove
> called me: one of the squids (specifically, cache3.c.vgnett.no) seems
> to be configured differently from the others, and seems to run
> directly against leonora instead of going through the second level
> squid. I also saw that you mentioned on IRC that one of the squids
> wasn't on the purge list...
As Stein-Ove writes, yes it's different because it's a Squid 2.6
It was not on the purgelist yesterday, but that seldom is a problem since
the Expire time is seldom or never actually honored by Squid (It refreshes
more often that whats set in Expires and in the config file). :) So the
front editors will not notice it as a "old" frontpage. Also cache3 is
handeling less traffic than Varnish, so it's hit more seldom.
That explains why the Varnish page was more visible as not honoring the
purge the editors sent.
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav
> Senior Software Developer
> Linpro AS - www.linpro.no
> varnish-dev mailing list
> varnish-dev at projects.linpro.no
More information about the varnish-dev