My first try with varnishd
andersb at vgnett.no
Sat Sep 23 00:35:33 CEST 2006
> [redirected to the mailing list]
> Jiang Hong <netex at 163.com> writes:
>> First congratulations to the 1.0 release of varnishd!
> Thank you!
>> The 'mmap' line told me varnishd uses mmap, so 1.6G cache file *SEEMED*
>> big for it (but isn't the limit 2GB?). Then I tried a 160MB cache file,
>> time varnishd started working!
> It successfully mapped the entire file, but for some reason there was
> too little address space left for malloc(). Try a slightly smaller
> file, or increase maxdsiz, or switch to a 64-bit machine.
>> So is it possible for varnishd to use multiple mmaps to use cache files
>> larger than 2GB? It is enough for most cases, but when the average file
>> size is larger than 2GB, it's much better to use a cache_dir like Squid.
> No, it's a matter of address space. Varnish does not use a two-level
> cache like Squid, it uses a single cache which is backed by a file to
> allow the VM system to swap it out if it runs low on physical memory.
> On a 64-bit machine, you can create a cache file as big as your entire
> disk if you want.
>> Can '-s malloc' be used with '-s file'? Squid uses memory as level-1
>> and disk storage as level-2 cache.
> No. Squid's two-level cache is precisely one of things that's wrong
> with it. It ends up fighting the VM system under heavy load. Varnish
> on the other hand tries to avoid doing work which the VM system
> already does better (like deciding which objects should be in physical
> memory and which should be on disk).
Great text/answers for the FAQ, DES.
> Yes, I'm working on it. For now, look through recent threads in the
> varnish-dev archive (http://projects.linpro.no/pipermail/varnish-dev/)
Great. I just wrote in another email that it was in /dev/null land for
now. Nothing is better than I was wrong.
More information about the varnish-dev