Support Cache-Control no-cache/private as per RFC2616 ?

[john allspaw]

Calling someone arrogant for assuming that Varnish would follow RFC2616 sounds over reactive to me. 

-john

p.s. I follow this list because I expect Varnish to be better than squid for my purposes (very large working set HTTP acceleration, both product and community wise. 

----- Original Message ----
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des at linpro.no>
To: Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o at rudd-o.com>
Cc: varnish-dev at projects.linpro.no
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 9:12:10 AM
Subject: Re: Support Cache-Control no-cache/private as per RFC2616 ?


"Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)" <rudd-o at rudd-o.com> writes:
> Do you really need to snap at contributors, Dag-Erling?

Which contributors?  All I see in this discussion are people trying to
tell me what to do with my (and my employer's) time.  It is one thing
to ask questions about something you do not understand, and quite
another to summarily decide that what you do not understand is wrong,
and must be changed, at somebody else's expense.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Senior Software Developer
Linpro AS - www.linpro.no
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev at projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev





      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better pen pal. 
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.  http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/