Support Cache-Control no-cache/private as per RFC2616 ?

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <62775B34-B1A2-4A83-84D4-549892FEEB6F at yahoo-inc.com>, Mark Nottingha
m writes:

>On 2007/11/21, at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> The only truly precise way to characterize varnish, IMO, is "A
>> webserver that uses HTTP to get at its content".
>
>This is a good characterisation. It would probably be more correct to  
>say "gateway" than "webserver", but most casual readers won't know  
>what that means.

Well, I specifically use "webserver" because Varnish should be
RFC2616 compliant as one, seen from the clients side.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.