Fresh patch for Solaris

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

Sorry for the comment at the end of my prevous email, got your
emails in reverse order here :-)

>> Doesn't Solaris have fcntl(F_SETLK) as mandated by POSIX ?

>Ah, good catch.  That wasn't a patch for Solaris.  It was for Linux.   
>We've run into some issues with flock being more reliable than fcntl  
>on Linux under high concurrency environments. 

We're not even remotely close to concurrency, so I'd prefer to stick
with fcntl until we see any actual problems.

>> Is there a reason to name the shared object .so instead of .o or is it
>> just cosmetics ?
>
>The Sun Studio toolchain barfs on the .o.  It "knows better" [...]

Ok, fair enough.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.