phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Aug 10 17:11:04 CEST 2010
In message <AANLkTi=xezeud84360cMyKyMCfPDJM--1RKDUYX8hFea at mail.gmail.com>, =?UT
>So far, the naming suggestion is a req.hash_control_always_miss =
Isn't that a bit long-winded ?
I would probably go with just req.hash_always_miss
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-dev