default hit_for_pass usage
Andreas Plesner Jacobsen
apj at mutt.dk
Tue Aug 23 09:14:05 CEST 2011
I was just going through the docs, updating examples to 3.0 syntax.
I fell over something that bothered me:
Has a section on increasing hit_for_pass ttl. I discussed rewriting this
section with DocWilco on irc, and we came to the conclusion that the current
default vcl may not be completely sane. For example, it looks like a 500 will
cause varnish to hit_for_pass for the next two minutes, even though the next
request could result in a nice cacheable 200.
Any ideas? Was this already considered when writing the default?
More information about the varnish-dev