"officially" supported compilers?

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <52CEB8A6.1050401 at schokola.de>, Nils Goroll writes:

>d9492da540430103b9dcd6844eb59b508c061d66 effectively breaks builds
>with gcc 3.4.

That was not the intention.

Can you find out which particular option it is ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.