[PATCH 3/3] Do not reset bereq on retry. Add rollback_bereq for this, purpose.

Federico Schwindt fgsch at lodoss.net
Tue Jul 22 02:26:08 CEST 2014

I've changed your diff to avoid splitting rollback. I don't think we should
make that distinction.
Also added v_b_e to the test and renamed ws_snap to be more inline with
other variables. ymmv.

btw, your patches were 2/3 and 3/3. Is 1/3 missing?

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Nils Goroll <slink at schokola.de> wrote:

> I thought we probably won't want to bump the major version, so I kept
> rollback
> as a wrapper for rollback_req
> Fixes #1512
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-dev mailing list
> varnish-dev at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20140722/036db7b1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 000-r01512.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4341 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20140722/036db7b1/attachment.bin>

More information about the varnish-dev mailing list