Via
Tollef Fog Heen
tfheen at fastly.com
Thu Mar 20 09:14:37 CET 2014
2014-03-20 8:37 GMT+01:00 Geoff Simmons <geoff at uplex.de>:
> I haven't found a way to read the RFC in such a way that a Via header
> should be added -- all of my attempted parsings say that a hop should
> appended to an existing header. Unless of course I've missed it, or
> unless they use the word "append" in an ambiguous way that encompasses
> both meanings (which unfortunately I wouldn't rule out with this RFC).
See last paragraph of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-4.2
. I think it's pretty clear it's allowed.
- Tollef
More information about the varnish-dev
mailing list