Via

Tollef Fog Heen tfheen at fastly.com
Thu Mar 20 09:14:37 CET 2014


2014-03-20 8:37 GMT+01:00 Geoff Simmons <geoff at uplex.de>:

> I haven't found a way to read the RFC in such a way that a Via header
> should be added -- all of my attempted parsings say that a hop should
> appended to an existing header. Unless of course I've missed it, or
> unless they use the word "append" in an ambiguous way that encompasses
> both meanings (which unfortunately I wouldn't rule out with this RFC).

See last paragraph of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-4.2
. I think it's pretty clear it's allowed.

- Tollef



More information about the varnish-dev mailing list