Varnish jails, priv-sep, packaging etc.

Leif Pedersen bilbo at
Thu Apr 16 00:20:35 CEST 2015

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Rogier 'DocWilco' Mulhuijzen <
varnish at> wrote:

> Dridi's suggestion of "vcache" is better than my "vrun".
> I agree. It's way more recognizable as being varnish related than "vrun"
> or "vworker".

Spell it out: "varnishcache"? Or are there actually relevant systems that
still can't handle more than 8 bytes?

(I hate to feel like I'm bikeshedding. I don't intend any statement about
what the words are, just suggesting that they not be abbreviated.)


As implied by email protocols, the information in this message is
not confidential.  Any middle-man or recipient may inspect, modify,
copy, forward, reply to, delete, or filter email for any purpose unless
said parties are otherwise obligated.  As the sender, I acknowledge that
I have a lower expectation of the control and privacy of this message
than I would a post-card.  Further, nothing in this message is
legally binding without cryptographic evidence of its integrity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the varnish-dev mailing list