Varnish jails, priv-sep, packaging etc.

[Leif Pedersen]

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Rogier 'DocWilco' Mulhuijzen <
varnish at bsdchicks.com> wrote:

> Dridi's suggestion of "vcache" is better than my "vrun".
>>
>
> I agree. It's way more recognizable as being varnish related than "vrun"
> or "vworker".
>

Spell it out: "varnishcache"? Or are there actually relevant systems that
still can't handle more than 8 bytes?

(I hate to feel like I'm bikeshedding. I don't intend any statement about
what the words are, just suggesting that they not be abbreviated.)

-- 

As implied by email protocols, the information in this message is
not confidential.  Any middle-man or recipient may inspect, modify,
copy, forward, reply to, delete, or filter email for any purpose unless
said parties are otherwise obligated.  As the sender, I acknowledge that
I have a lower expectation of the control and privacy of this message
than I would a post-card.  Further, nothing in this message is
legally binding without cryptographic evidence of its integrity.

http://bilbo.hobbiton.org/wiki/Eat_My_Sig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20150415/e1fced00/attachment-0001.html>