[master] d771942 Hide backends and directors implementation details

Federico Schwindt fgsch at lodoss.net
Mon Aug 24 13:06:16 CEST 2015


On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:

> --------
> In message <
> CAJV_h0Yj-fLdhR7Qv0PgJU1Kg_XZKR_0Cie3aGXKXJWd2rEckw at mail.gmail.com>
> , Federico Schwindt writes:
> >[..]
> >This pollutes cache.h and causes artificial breakages. I'd prefer, if we
> >really want to do this, to take the _int.h approach.
>
> I have refrained from this myself, because I have a really hard time
> deciding where the line should be drawn.
>

We should try to be consistent while we decide.


> >I also had a chat with Martin not so long ago and one of the things that
> >came in that discussion is the possibility of installing all the includes.
> >This is a step backwards from that.
>
> I'm not too thrilled about that either, because that makes everything
> in varnishd an API seen from a VMOD point of view.
>

Aren't we there already, e.g. https://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/ticket/1759
?

Not installing everything just makes things harder for not much gain AFAICT.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20150824/3b4d8f74/attachment.html>


More information about the varnish-dev mailing list