"expire superseded" in master

[Jingyi Wei]

Hello Nils,

Thank you for your patch. I tested it just now and I didn't see any
memory increase caused by "expire superseded" objects.

Thanks,
Jingyi Wei

On 01/07/15 10:55, Nils Goroll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you please retest master 0302e16e8888d9213931077b9b331f72dcc018b6 or newer?
>
> Thanks, Nils
>
> On 19/12/14 10:36, Nils Goroll wrote:
>> On 19/12/14 02:14, Jingyi Wei wrote:
>>> I see that
>>> bo->ims_obj is set in VBF_Fetch() only if Last-Modified or ETag header
>>> exists in the previous backend response. Otherwise |ims_obj| is NULL and
>>> the memory will not be freed, so the actual problem is that there's no
>>> Last-Modified header in our backend response.
>> Good point, thank you. LM or ETag are required for issuing a backend conditional
>> request, but this should be independent of freeing the superseded object. I will
>> look after this unless someone else does.
>>
>> Nils
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> varnish-dev mailing list
>> varnish-dev at varnish-cache.org
>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
>>
>