Cache_req_body patch for bug #1664

[Federico Schwindt]

I thought we will be handling this more gracefully, e.g not just closing
the connection.

How is the user going to notice it needs to increase the size if it was set
to something lower than needed unintentionally?
Shouldn't we have a counter at the very least and/or return a 503?



On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Arianna Aondio <
arianna.aondio at varnish-software.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> before Hamburg VDD I had sent an email regarding req.body handling and
> user-accesible functions.
> I attach a patch for bug #1664: std.cache_req_body(BYTES size)doesn't have
> errors handling on the provided size limitation.
>
> The proposed solution let Varnish either buffer the whole request body or
> fail the request.
>
> If this patch is ok, I can then start digging into user-accesible
> functions.
>
> Comments much appreciated.
>
>
> --
> Arianna Aondio
> Software Developer | Varnish Software AS
> Mobile: +47 980 62 619
>
>  We Make Websites Fly
> www.varnish-software.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-dev mailing list
> varnish-dev at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20150309/5a73437a/attachment.html>