Assertion failure in VCL_DelBackend()

[Geoff Simmons]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 11/16/2015 12:41 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
>> Well OK, but is there really a use case for backends with
>> anything shorter than PRIV_VCL lifetime?
> 
> A backend when popens a CGI command for this request ?

I'm sure I wouldn't do that by creating and then destroying a struct
director every time. Of course the API can be open for unforeseen
ideas, but in this case it seems like a real stretch.

And as I said earlier, I have no intuition at all about what a
PRIV_CALL-scoped backend could be.


Best,
Geoff
- -- 
** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung

Scheffelstraße 32
22301 Hamburg

Tel +49 40 2880 5731
Mob +49 176 636 90917
Fax +49 40 42949753

http://uplex.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=H9Ek
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----