[master] 0577f3f RFC7230/3.2.4 compliance.

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

--------
In message <CABoVN9BGw0SuVWj_kA9fym6wszoDr8+7W2J08iTfZXgRMznbXQ at mail.gmail.com>, Dridi Boukelmoune writes:

>Should I send a patch that performs the grammar check and fails with
>an "Invalid field-name in header ..." message instead?

Improvements are always welcome :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.