thoughts about vcl cleanup around (be)resp.body and abandon/synth

[Federico Schwindt]

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi at varni.sh> wrote:

> [..]
> > While this is feasible, I sill don't understand why we would need a
> de-tour over
> > v_b_e just to create a synthetic body.
>
> The problem with using v_b_e is that you need to trick Varnish to get
> there on purpose
>

I think we all agree that there should be a way to go to vcl_backend_error
from the other 2 backend subroutines.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20161130/8f8c3307/attachment-0001.html>