VCL storage discussion summary

Poul-Henning Kamp phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Oct 10 18:55:29 CEST 2016


--------
In message <CAJV_h0Yx8t4MoLpfk3kRpukxuyotXHesf4ctATgu2QwFTqvxxA at mail.gmail.com>
, Federico Schwindt writes:

>If setting or using a storage cannot fail I'd say kill _hint (eventually)
>and just use storage.
>
>If there is a chance of failing, I'd keep the _hint. I'd avoid having both.
>Having backend_hint and backend is confusing enough already.

I agree, and I'd like to kill backend_hint as well.

That said, in both cases we need to deal with "no setting" and "vmod
returning NULL".

For backend, it's the default backend.

Is it Transient for storage ?

If so, I think we have a decision...


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



More information about the varnish-dev mailing list