VCL storage discussion summary

[Federico Schwindt]

Doesn't that depend on whether is a cache insertion or pass?

Are we considering changing that?



On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:

> --------
> In message <CAJV_h0aO0fp9rNMiJCByfoxd7wTOZG2Q7z
> cy_rR2Xju87UiXAw at mail.gmail.com>
> , Federico Schwindt writes:
>
> >Assuming this will depend on whether this is the client or the backend
> side
> >(request vs response), yes,
> >
> >for the request body Transient being the default makes sense (current
> >behaviour).
>
> You left out what will make sense on backend side ?
>
> I don't see an alternative to Transient, and I might even advocate pass...
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20161010/c1e3f718/attachment-0001.html>