VCL storage discussion summary

Federico Schwindt fgsch at lodoss.net
Mon Oct 10 19:37:56 CEST 2016


This might be obvious but are we considering NULL a "no setting" as well or
only when a VMOD returns NULL?

If it's the latter I agree. The former would be a breaking change.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:

> --------
> In message <CAJV_h0aCYq9qX4TNJOKkymw4BgmHFh3pcb
> gG88CEL9Uv-K74oQ at mail.gmail.com>
> , Federico Schwindt writes:
>
> >Doesn't that depend on whether is a cache insertion or pass?
> >
> >Are we considering changing that?
>
> If we have NULL for stevedore and it is an insert, I would consider
> making it pass+Transient, to limit the amount of non-placed storage
> we need.
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20161010/54088005/attachment.html>


More information about the varnish-dev mailing list