hit-for-pass vs. hit-for-miss

Nils Goroll slink at schokola.de
Wed Sep 7 22:10:08 CEST 2016

On 07/09/16 22:02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> It is not my impression that there is an issue with "normal" backend
> response times, but correct me if I'm wrong ?

The general issue is that for a miss, we should remove IMS/INM, but not for a pass.

So any backend function where validation is efficient while delivery is not will
be hit.


More information about the varnish-dev mailing list