Varnish code coverage results online
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Fri Jan 6 14:28:54 CET 2017
In message <CABoVN9Ad=R+qyAGz1+_XYXbzOvr6krHUYVoBi44PyEGUeNm7ig at mail.gmail.com>, Dridi Boukelmoune
>I thought gcov'ed binaries could run concurrently if the underlying
>file-system allowed it. I never had any issue with gcov and parallel
>builds and regardless, if varnishtest spawns a varnishd, won't they
>compete on coverage collection for libvarnish for instance?
Last I tried it, I got totally screwed up numbers.
(And no, because varnishtest waits for varnishd to exit before it
>I don't know about simplest, running nightly builds from a script that
>runs pseudo-continuously doesn't sound straightforward.
if `date +%Y%m%d` changed do gcov ?
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the varnish-dev