UDS decisions

[Dridi Boukelmoune]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Nils Goroll <slink at schokola.de> wrote:
> WFM, but one thing:
>
>> 1. We will use bogo-IP numbers for client UDS connections
>
> As long as we get VCL access to the accept socket name, we should not need the
> uds socket path. But we should have a way to differentiate between
> /untrusted/external.socket and /highly/secure/internal.socket

That would be "named listen addresses" described in the same VIP as
UDS, and currently half-implemented in trunk (names exist, but aren't
usable in VCL).

While at it, WFM too.

Dridi