calling for a new workspace sizing concept - Re: auto-tune ws / headroom poc

Federico Schwindt fgsch at lodoss.net
Wed Jan 31 00:48:42 UTC 2018


I prefer less knobs so I'm inclined to agree with Dridi's suggestion.

I'd propose to make the math but keep the final workspaces' numbers as they
are and bump them after the release.

That would keep the footprint similar to what it is today and we could
document the change in advance (and warn about the bump).


On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:

> --------
>
> Let me just lay down a ground rule here:
>
> 1. I think this is an important thing to (re)consider, by all means
>    go at it.
>
> 2. No commits related to this until after march 15th,.
>
> Poul-Henning
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> _______________________________________________
> varnish-dev mailing list
> varnish-dev at varnish-cache.org
> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/attachments/20180131/1c159715/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the varnish-dev mailing list