From scan-admin at coverity.com Mon Jul 7 11:09:16 2025 From: scan-admin at coverity.com (scan-admin at coverity.com) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 11:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for varnish Message-ID: <686baadc30885_1a1a892d27936c79a0243a9@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dridi at varni.sh Mon Jul 7 14:09:48 2025 From: dridi at varni.sh (Dridi Boukelmoune) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 14:09:48 +0000 Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for varnish In-Reply-To: <686baadc30885_1a1a892d27936c79a0243a9@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail> References: <686baadc30885_1a1a892d27936c79a0243a9@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail> Message-ID: I may have accidentally captured this in a test case. https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/issues/4357 Dridi On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 11:09?AM wrote: > Hi, > > The analysis for your project *varnish* has been successfully completed. > You can view the results by clicking the button below: > > View Build Results > Build Details: > > - *Build ID:* 707829 > - *New Defects Found:* 1 > - *Defects Eliminated:* 0 > > Summary: > > We found 1 new defect(s) in this build. Please review and address them as > needed. > > If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to contact us: > > - Email: scan-admin at coverity.com > - Visit our StackOverflow page > > > Thank you for using Coverity Scan! > > Best regards, > > The Coverity Scan Admin Team > _______________________________________________ > varnish-dev mailing list > varnish-dev at varnish-cache.org > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scan-admin at coverity.com Thu Jul 10 07:53:46 2025 From: scan-admin at coverity.com (scan-admin at coverity.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 07:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for varnish Message-ID: <686f718a8db3c_1d04092d27936c79a02437d@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nils.goroll at uplex.de Fri Jul 11 07:42:06 2025 From: nils.goroll at uplex.de (Nils Goroll) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:42:06 +0200 Subject: who would have thought that gmtime_r uses a mutex? Message-ID: <32a4b97e-d676-4271-bd50-5ee3215657f1@uplex.de> Just dropping this here, not sure if it's worth doing anything about it (probably not). But I was really surprised... from `perf report` of a synthetic benchmark: - 12.52% cnt_synth - 5.24% Resp_Setup_Synth - 3.50% http_TimeHeader - 3.16% VTIM_format - 1.69% __lll_lock_wait_private - 1.63% entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe - 1.63% do_syscall_64 - 1.56% x64_sys_call - 1.56% __x64_sys_futex - 1.56% do_futex - futex_wait - 1.55% __futex_wait - 1.32% futex_wait_setup - 1.29% futex_q_lock - 1.26% _raw_spin_lock native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath - 0.64% __lll_lock_wake_private - 0.64% entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe - 0.63% do_syscall_64 - 0.61% x64_sys_call - 0.61% __x64_sys_futex - 0.61% do_futex 0.59% futex_wake - 0.56% __GI___snprintf 0.54% __vsnprintf_internal 0.86% http_PrintfHeader https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=time/tzset.c;h=0ddc20328717bcf695de370cb48c83b06a7e076b;hb=HEAD#l572 called from https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=time/gmtime.c;h=ad6e8eb35233f6018607b938f303dc75323c8f6e;hb=HEAD#l26 maybe this is for simplicity of the code, but as `use_localtime` is zero, the stuff at the top of the function under the lock would not be required, _I think_ (am I wrong?). Nils -- Nils Goroll (he/him) ** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung Scheffelstra?e 32 22301 Hamburg tel +49 40 28805731 mob +49 170 2723133 fax +49 40 42949753 xmpp://slink at jabber.int.uplex.de/ http://uplex.de/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0x1DCD8F57A3868BD7.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 3943 bytes Desc: OpenPGP public key URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From scan-admin at coverity.com Mon Jul 14 10:03:58 2025 From: scan-admin at coverity.com (scan-admin at coverity.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for varnish Message-ID: <6874d60e50010_2111bf2d27936c79a0243d2@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scan-admin at coverity.com Mon Jul 21 09:10:34 2025 From: scan-admin at coverity.com (scan-admin at coverity.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 09:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for varnish Message-ID: <687e040a61c74_281d2f2ea7f5d7b99894e2@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scan-admin at coverity.com Mon Jul 28 10:09:57 2025 From: scan-admin at coverity.com (scan-admin at coverity.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for varnish Message-ID: <68874c74239d3_23f0e2dd3d8507998907ca@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: