<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1">
<TITLE>Re: Logging</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText4676 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>The only reason would be to
hold network traffic down, but we are probably talking a hell of a lot of
traffic before we staurate any kind of modern line. But if the traffis is
on the same network where Varnish delivers this could be a
problem for some. We could also assume a dedicated network for admin
and logging, but that might not always be the case/feasable, _then_
it has a point.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>VG Netts blades have 2 NIC's on each blade
when they are half height. Take into account that we are aiming for network
redundancy on our rigg, we might have to hack some to get a failover solution
working correctly.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>So there is a point to it, in the future,
but maybe not V 1.0.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Anders Berg</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>Fra:</B> varnish-dev-bounces@projects.linpro.no på
vegne av Dag-Erling Smørgrav<BR><B>Sendt:</B> ma 10.07.2006 17:24<BR><B>Til:</B>
varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no<BR><B>Emne:</B> Re: Logging<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Anders Berg <andersb@vgnett.no> writes:<BR>> while I
might not be the right one to answer I'll give it a shot.<BR>> Right now
Varnish is logging alot of data involved in the request<BR>> handling to
shared memory on each of the Varnish servers. It's a<BR>> shared memory
buffer at a fixed size (default 8M right now I think),<BR>> and Varnish
writes to it in a FIFO manner.<BR><BR>It's a circular buffer, actually; varnish
doesn't care if anyone reads<BR>it.<BR><BR>> I am uncertain if we are gonnna
implement a way to tell the Varnish<BR>> daemon itself what we want it to
logg in V 1.0.<BR><BR>I don't see any point in doing so.</FONT><FONT
size=2><BR><BR>DES<BR>--<BR>Dag-Erling Smørgrav<BR>Senior Software
Developer<BR>Linpro AS -
www.linpro.no<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>varnish-dev
mailing list<BR>varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no<BR><A
href="http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev">http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev</A><BR></P></DIV></FONT>
<p><span style="font-family:'Arial';font-size:8pt;">*****************************************************************</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Arial';font-size:8pt;">Denne fotnoten bekrefter at denne e-postmeldingen ble</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Arial';font-size:8pt;">skannet av MailSweeper og funnet fri for virus.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Arial';font-size:8pt;">*****************************************************************</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Arial';font-size:8pt;">This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Arial';font-size:8pt;">MailSweeper for the presence of computer viruses.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Arial';font-size:8pt;">*****************************************************************</span></p></BODY>
</HTML>